FILM REVIEWS WITH DAVE CLARKE

Fandango Widewheels wrote:

bigdaddy wrote:

Son of Nod wrote:HO HO HO HO....

I am looking forward to this, but not as much as the second Batman Xbox game. KAPOW.

For the outifts or the action?


Seriosuly though, I've never played any of the Batman games. Are they any good?

Fandango Widewheels wrote:
Transformers 3 was pretty good in a very childish robots and explosions kind of way. Rosie Huntington Whiteley was absolutely shocking in it though. She should definitely stick to modelling.

Sherrers wrote:

Fandango Widewheels wrote:
Transformers 3 was pretty good in a very childish robots and explosions kind of way. Rosie Huntington Whiteley was absolutely shocking in it though. She should definitely stick to modelling.

Airfix? she any good at dioramas? I was dead good at them.

Er... Forum film rules reminder. Killer robots + Spaceships = automatically ace.

Science Fict-factoid.

wookie wrote:Sherlock holmes, with the downey one and bude law, it was alot better then i was expecting

Son of Nod wrote:

wookie wrote:Sherlock holmes, with the downey one and bude law, it was alot better then i was expecting

I rather enjoyed it when I watched it. Are they doing another?

Son of Nod wrote:Fast and Furious 5.....bloddy ace stuns....shite story line.....ace stunts!!!

Fandango Widewheels wrote:

Son of Nod wrote:Fast and Furious 5.....bloddy ace stuns....shite story line.....ace stunts!!!

That is now getting beyond a joke. How many films can you make about driving fast? Agree they have ace stunts in though.

Son of Nod wrote:

Fandango Widewheels wrote:

Son of Nod wrote:Fast and Furious 5.....bloddy ace stuns....shite story line.....ace stunts!!!

That is now getting beyond a joke. How many films can you make about driving fast? Agree they have ace stunts in though.

5

wookie wrote:hahaha

best answer i've seen in a while

wookie wrote:ladies (if there is any) and gentlemen

just when you thought mega shark vs giant octopus, couldn't be bettered

the syfy channel showed this the other day

[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharktopus

Fandango Widewheels wrote:On a more serious note this is a cracking film.



http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0480669/

Son of Nod wrote:

Fandango Widewheels wrote:On a more serious note this is a cracking film.



http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0480669/

''A man accidentally gets into a time machine and travels back in time nearly an hour. Finding himself will be the first of a series of disasters of unforeseeable consequences.''

How is this possible.....accidentally gets into a time machine??!!

Sherrers wrote:Can you please post at least a pic of what you are on about?

Some of us can't be arsed leaving the forum.


Ta


Wait? goes back AN HOUR in time!? talk about blank canvas syndrome. Ok you have all of time and possibly due to Heisenberg, Rosen and Co...all of Space to write about...

"mmmm I will send back our plucky hero ONE HOUR on time! Ha ha. Hollywood will batter my back door in! I am sure of it!"

wookie wrote:meet sharktopus

Fandango Widewheels wrote:

Sherrers wrote:Can you please post at least a pic of what you are on about?

Some of us can't be arsed leaving the forum.


Ta


Wait? goes back AN HOUR in time!? talk about blank canvas syndrome. Ok you have all of time and possibly due to Heisenberg, Rosen and Co...all of Space to write about...

"mmmm I will send back our plucky hero ONE HOUR on time! Ha ha. Hollywood will batter my back door in! I am sure of it!"

It's a good film. Why go back millions of years when just an hour will do it. Saves on CGI.



I can't do pics from work. The IT police block all hosting websites for some reason.

Fandango Widewheels wrote:

wookie wrote:meet sharktopus

Hahahaha, it's Broadhead on a Monday morning.